Comments on: of Montreal Flagpole Article http://www.ofmontreal.net/2008/11/05/of-montreal-flagpole-article/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:53:52 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Danielle http://www.ofmontreal.net/2008/11/05/of-montreal-flagpole-article/comment-page-1/#comment-45 Danielle Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:27:38 +0000 http://www.ofmontreal.net/?p=562#comment-45 "There was this character I created called Georgie Fruit, and now I wish I never did, because people are like, "is that a Kevin Barnes song, or a Georgie Fruit song?"... and really there's no difference. They're all Kevin Barnes songs, and I don't like that idea of people seeing a division. I think people would see that as less genuine, but it seems like it's not based in reality, like you're writing from the point of view of a fictional character. That's too much like a defense mechanism. I want all my songs to be like, really coming from the heart and maybe if they're not about something that's physically happened, like a physical experience that I've had, I don't really make a division between the physical and the dream state or the emotional state. I don't really make the division. If you fantasize about something that's just as real as if you really did it." I feel like no one is really getting this. So many people are stubbornly saying "oh this is a Georgie Fruit song, and this is a Kevin Barnes song." This article said that too. I think that this super album deserves to be properly understood. BTW, just wanted to say thanks for an unbelievingly amazing Halloween show. “There was this character I created called Georgie Fruit, and now I wish I never did, because people are like, “is that a Kevin Barnes song, or a Georgie Fruit song?”… and really there’s no difference. They’re all Kevin Barnes songs, and I don’t like that idea of people seeing a division. I think people would see that as less genuine, but it seems like it’s not based in reality, like you’re writing from the point of view of a fictional character. That’s too much like a defense mechanism. I want all my songs to be like, really coming from the heart and maybe if they’re not about something that’s physically happened, like a physical experience that I’ve had, I don’t really make a division between the physical and the dream state or the emotional state. I don’t really make the division. If you fantasize about something that’s just as real as if you really did it.”

I feel like no one is really getting this. So many people are stubbornly saying “oh this is a Georgie Fruit song, and this is a Kevin Barnes song.” This article said that too. I think that this super album deserves to be properly understood. BTW, just wanted to say thanks for an unbelievingly amazing Halloween show.

]]>